AMRESH PATEL @ AMRESH KUMAR v. The State of Bihar Bihar
Case at a glance
Outcome
Bail granted
Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 34, 363, 366A
- Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 s. 8
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 164
Judgment
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : For the Opposite Party/s : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY Mr.Bimlesh Kumar Pandey, Advocate Mr.Atul Chandra, APP ORAL ORDER 2 31-08-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. The petitioner is in judicial custody in connection with Gaunaha P.S. Case No. 18 of 2023 registered under Sections 363 and 366A/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 8 of the POCSO Act lodged on 01.02.2023 by the informant, Afroz Alam. As per the prosecution story, the allegation is that the informant’s sister disappeared along with Rs. 50,000/- which was kept for marriage and some jewellery. Further it came to notice that this petitioner has a role in her missing. Accordingly, the FIR. Learned counsel for the petitioner straight way taken Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57104 of 2023(2) dt.31-08-2023 the Court to Annexure-2 which is the statement of the victim girl under section 164 of the Cr.P.C. in which she has stated that she was not willing to do domestic work and there was a quarrel. Fed up with that, she left the place and hide herself in a neighbour’s house. Learned counsel further submits that the victim girl nowhere has taken the name of the petitioner in the said statement. Learned APP opposes the prayer stating that the informant has suspicion against the petitioner behind the missing of his sister. Taking into account the submissions put forward by the learned counsel for the parties, statement of the victim girl under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C., he is in custody since
Operative part
02.05.2023 (as stated in paragraph-11 of the petition) and do not have criminal antecedent, this Court is inclined to grant him privilege of bail. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge, POCSO cum ADJ -VII, Bettiah, West Champaran in connection with Gaunaha P.S. Case NO. 18 of 2023 subject to the following conditions: Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57104 of 2023(2) dt.31-08-2023 (i) one of the bailor should be the family member of the petitioner who shall provide official document to show his/her bona fide; (ii) the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the Trial court and failure to do so for two consecutive dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of his/her bail bond by the Trial court itself; (iii) the petitioner shall in no way try to induce or promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidences, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds; (iv) the petitioner shall desist from committing any criminal offence again failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of the bail bonds. Jagdish/- U T (Rajiv Roy, J)
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 34, 363, 366A; Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 — s. 8; Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 164.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.