VIKASH KUMAR v. The State of Bihar
Case at a glance
Outcome
Bail granted
present anticipatory bail application is allowed
Provisions considered
Judgment
Operative part
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : For the Opposite Party/s : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR Mr.Alok Kumar Alok Mr.Chandra Sen Prasad Singh ORAL ORDER 2 28-04-2022 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to remove defect(s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of four weeks from today. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Parsa P.S. Case No. 258 of 2021 registered for the offences punishable under Section 307 and other allied sections of the Indian Penal Code. Considering the fact that the petitioner has also been injured and the injuries caused by him is simple in nature, the present anticipatory bail application is allowed. Accordingly, let the petitioner above named be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58812 of 2021(2) dt.28-04-2022 court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM-9, Saran at Chapra, in connection with Parsa P.S. Case No. 258 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Sandeep Kumar, J) Saif/- U T
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: present anticipatory bail application is allowed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Indian Penal Code, 1860; Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 438(2).
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.