SACHIN KUMAR v. The State of Bihar
Case at a glance
Outcome
Bail granted
the case, let the above named petitioner be released on bail, in
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 34, 376, 379, 420, 504, 506, 509
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 438(2)
Judgment
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : For the Opposite Party/s : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA Mr. Gopesh Raj, Adv. Mr. Arun Kumar Singh, APP ORAL ORDER 3 30-08-2023
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Mahila P.S. Case No. 18 of 2023 registered under Sections 376, 379, 420, 504, 506, 509/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 67(A) of the I.T. Act.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. Further submission is that the first information report has been lodged after a delay of 3 years of the incidence. The petitioner has got no criminal antecedent.
Operative part
Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner be released on bail, in Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51885 of 2023(3) dt.30-08-2023 the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing personal bond to the satisfaction of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Samastipur in connection with Mahila P.S. Case No. 18 of 2023, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr. P.C. utkarsh/- U T (Arvind Srivastava, J)
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: the case, let the above named petitioner be released on bail, in
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 34, 376, 379, 420, 504, 506, 509; Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 438(2).
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.