Lakshaman Sharma v. Surendra Singh
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
circumstances, this appeal is dismissed for default under
Provisions considered
Judgment
Operative part
None Mr. Jitendra Prasad Singh, Advocate Mr. Rajeev Kumar, Advocate : : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 14 08-05-2023 Nobody appears on behalf of the Appellant on repeated calls. However, Ld. APP for the Respondents is present. Even on the last date, no one had appeared on behalf of the Appellant and the Appellant was cautioned to attend the matter on the next date, failing which the matter will be dismissed for dafault under Rule 17 of Order XLI of CPC. However, despite such cautioning, nobody is present even today on behalf of the Appellant. Ld. counsel for the Respondent is pressing for dismissal of the appeal for default of the Appellant to attend Patna High Court FA No.26 of 2012(14) dt.08-05-2023 the matter. Hence, considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, this appeal is dismissed for default under Rule 17 of Order XLI of CPC. skm/- U (Jitendra Kumar, J)
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: circumstances, this appeal is dismissed for default under
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.