AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 56444 of 2021 · Patna High Court
Case at a glance
- Bench
- SATYAVRAT VERMA
Outcome
Allowed
The application stands allowed
Provisions considered
- Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 ss. 30(a), 39(c)
- Amended Act, 2018
Judgment
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : For the Opposite Party/s : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA Mr.Bhavesh Kumar Mr. Braj Kishore Pd.(App) ORAL ORDER 2 07-01-2022 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State, through Video Conferencing. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with PR No. 44 dated 13.08.2021, corresponding to Excise Case No. 341 of 2021, instituted for the offences under Sections 30(a), 39(c) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 (Amended Act 2018). The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 14.08.2021 and prosecution report has been submitted in this case and allegation is of recovery of 600 kg. of Jaggery solution along with 15 litres of country-made liquor from the house of the petitioner. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56444 of 2021(2) dt.07-01-2022 house does not belong to the petitioner and it was abandoned house, thus the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. Learned A.P.P. opposes the bail application. Considering the fact that petitioner is in custody since
Operative part
14.08.2021 and prosecution report has been submitted, the petitioner, above-named, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs.3,000/- (Three Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Spl. Judge, Excise, Muzaffarpur, in connection with PR No. 44 dated 13.08.2021, corresponding to Excise Case No. 341 of 2021. The application stands allowed. (Satyavrat Verma, J) sanjeev/- U T
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The application stands allowed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 — ss. 30(a), 39(c); Amended Act, 2018.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.