✦ Patna High Court

Gopalganj v. The State of Bihar

AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 47651 of 2023CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA3 min read

Case at a glance

Bench
CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA

Key paragraphs

  • Para 77. Considering the facts and circumstances as mentioned above and by taking note of the fact as nothing appears during the course of investigation as to suggest, prima facie, culpable mental state of petitioner regarding possession of alleged contraband, where recovery of alleged motorcycle appears…

Judgment

Mr. Amit Kumar Anand, Advocate Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, APP 3 08-09-2023 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

2.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Gopalganj (Town) P.S. Case No. 156 of 2023 registered for the offence under Sections 413 and 414 of the Indian Penal Code and under Sections 08 and 20(b)(ii)(c) of the N.D.P.S. Act (Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act).

3.

The accused/petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and is in custody since 02.03.2023.

4.

The allegation against the petitioner is to have in possession of stolen motorcycle and also with contraband i.e., Charas like substances total of 1.078 grams, as per seizure list.

5.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that petitioner was not apprehended on spot and his name appears in this case on the basis of disclosure made by apprehended co-accused persons, namely, Rahul Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47651 of 2023(3) dt.08-09-2023 Kumar Yadav and Rajpal Paswan. It is submitted that alleged contraband was recovered from possession of apprehended co- accused Rahul Kumar Yadav and Rajpal Paswan, where nothing surfaced during the course of investigation which may suggest to invite presumptions regarding culpable mental state of this petitioner. It is further pointed out that as recovery of contraband not appears to be made from the possession of this petitioner, therefore, the application of rigorous provision as available under Section 37 of the N.D.P.S. Act not appears to be applicable in present case. It is further pointed out that the motorcycle as alleged to be recovered from the possession of this petitioner was appears to be made from the verandah, which is an open place and accessible by general public and cannot be said to be recovered from his conscious physical possession. It is further submitted that the cash and mobile belongs to this petitioner. It is also submitted that the apprehended co-accused Rajpal Paswan has already been granted bail by one of the learned Co-ordinate Bench of this Court through Cr. Misc. No. 53203 of 2023 vide order dated

24.08.2023. While concluding the argument, it has been submitted that petitioner found involved in one more criminal case, where he is on bail and moreover, investigation of this Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47651 of 2023(3) dt.08-09-2023 case has been completed for which charge-sheet has been submitted, and as such, there is no chance of tampering with the evidence.

6.

Learned APP opposes the prayer of bail.

7.

Considering the facts and circumstances as mentioned above and by taking note of the fact as nothing appears during the course of investigation as to suggest, prima facie, culpable mental state of petitioner regarding possession of alleged contraband, where recovery of alleged motorcycle appears to be made from an open place coupled with the fact that charge-sheet has already submitted, where petitioner is in custody since 02.03.2023, accordingly, above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Gopalganj (Town) P.S. Case No. 156 of 2023 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge (N.D.P.S.) Act, Gopalganj/concerned court, subject to the conditions as mentioned under Section 437 (3) of the Cr.P.C. pooja/- U T (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.)

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Patna High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 47651 of 2023). ← Search more judgments