Pashupati Jha v. The State of Bihar
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 34, 323, 324, 341, 354, 448, 504, 506
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 438(2)
Judgment
Amit Kumar Jha S/o Pasupati Jha R/o village- Brahampura, P.S.- Manigachhi, District- Darbhanga The State of Bihar Versus ... ... Petitioner/s ... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioners : For the Opposite Party : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR Mr.Girish Chandra Jha, Advocate Mrs. Pushpa Sinha No.1, APP ORAL ORDER 9 10-02-2022 The matter is being heard through video conferencing due to circumstances prevailing on account of Covid-19 pandemic. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Manigachhi P.S. Case No.93 of 2020 registered for offences under Sections 341, 323, 448, 324, 354, 504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners prays and is granted permission to withdraw this application on behalf of petitioner no.2, namely, Amit Kumar Jha. The application for anticipatory bail is dismissed as withdrawn so far as petitioner no.2, namely, Amit Kumar Jha is concerned. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40383 of 2020(9) dt.10-02-2022 In case petitioner no.2, namely, Amit Kumar Jha surrenders and prays for regular bail before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, the court below will consider the petition for regular bail of the petitioner without being prejudiced by the fact that anticipatory bail petition has been rejected by this Court. So far as petitioner no.1, namely, Pashupati Jha is concerned, he is said to be the order giver and thereafter all the accused persons assaulted the injured. Considering the nature of injuries and the allegations against petitioner no.1, namely, Pashupati Jha, this application for anticipatory bail is allowed. Accordingly, let petitioner no.1, namely, Pashupati Jha, in the event of his arrest or surrender within ten weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-V, Darbhanga in connection with Manigachhi P.S. Case No.93 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. BT/- U T (Sandeep Kumar, J)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.