Patna High Court
Case Details
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CIVIL WRIT JURISDICTION CASE NO.13954 OF 2013 =================================================== 1.MADAN MOHAN DAS SON OF SRI ADALAT RAM RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - GORIACHHAPRA, P.O. RIVILGANJ, P.S. RIVILGANJ, DISTRICT - SARAN AT CHHAPRA 2.SANJEEV KUMAR SAH GOND @ SANJEEV KUMAR SON OF SRI BALESHWAR SAH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - TAJPUR, P.O. PHULWARIA TAJPUR, P.S. MANJHI, DISTRICT - SARAN AT CHHAPRA 3.AMBARI KHATOON DAUGHTER OF JAPHIR AHMAD RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - NARPALIYA, P.O. NARPALIYA, P.S. MANJHI, DISTRICT - SARAN AT CHHAPRA 4.RAMBHA PANDIT D/O SRI SUDAMA PANDIT RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - BHALUWA BUJURAG, P.O. KHANPUR, P.S. EKMA, DISTRICT - SARAN AT CHHAPRA 5.SANTOSH KUMAR CHAUDHARY SON OF SRI BACHHA LAL CHOUDHARY RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - BAHORAN SINGH KA TOLA P.O. MANJHI, P.S. MANJHI, DISTRICT - SARAN AT CHHAPRA 6.VIDYA KUMARI D/O SRI ADALAT MARIJAN RESIDENT OF BAREJA, P.O. BAREJA, P.S. DAUDPUR, DISTRICT - SARAN AT CHHAPRA 7.RAJESH KUMAR CHOUDHARY @ RAJESH KUMAR SON OF SRI PARAS NATH CHOUDHARY RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - SIRASIA RAMPUR, P.O. RIVILGANJ, P.S. RIVILGANJ, DISTRICT - SARAN AT CHHAPRA 8.RINKU DEVI D/O SRI RAJENDRA RAM RESIDENT OF VILL. - KHANPUR, P.O. KHANPUR, P.S. EKMA, DISTRICT - SARAN AT CHHAPRA 9.ARATI KUMARI D/O SRI SHIVNATH RAI R/O VILLAGE - TAJPUR, P.O. PHULWARIA TAJPUR, P.S. MANJHI, DISTRICT - SARAN AT CHHAPRA 10. CHITRAREKHA KUMARI D/O SRI SATRUDHAN THAKUR R/O VILLAGE - DUMAIGARH, P.O. DUMAIGARH, P.S. MANJHI, DISTRICT - SARAN AT CHHAPRA .... .... PETITIONER/S HUMAN PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, VERSUS 1.THE STATE OF BIHAR, THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNANA 2.THE DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 3.THE DIRECTOR ( PRIMARY EDUCATION ) HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA 4.THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, SARAN AT CHHAPRA 5.THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, SARAN AT CHHAPRA 6.THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, MANJHI, SARAN AT CHHAPRA 7.THE BLOCK EDUCATION EXTENSION OFFICER,MANJHI, RESOURCES
Facts
Patna High Court CWJC No.13954 of 2013 (2) dt.26-07-2013 2 SARAN AT CHHAPRA 8.THE MUKHIYA, GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ TAJPUR, BLOCK MANJHI P.O. PHULWARIA TAJPUR DISTRICT SARAN AT CHHAPRA 9.THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, GRAM PANCHAYAT RAJ TAJPUR MANJHI P.O. PHULWARIA TAJPUR DISTRICT SARAN AT CHHAPRA 10.THE DISTRICT TEACHER EMPLOYMENT APPELLATE AUTHORITY SARAN AT CHHAPRA.
Legal Reasoning
this Court in C.W.J.C No. 6997 of 2009. This Court while exercising its power under article-226 of the Constitution of India in the matter which has been adjudicated by the Tribunal is not required to go into the question of fact when such finding recorded by the Tribunal is not even alleged to be based on any error on record. Thus if the entire process of selection was itself found to be vitiated by the Tribunal on account of non compliance of the provisions of Bihar Panchayat Teachers Rules 2006, no relief could have been given to the petitioners by the Tribunal. This Court infact also does not find such findings recorded by the Tribunal to be Patna High Court CWJC No.13954 of 2013 (2) dt.26-07-2013 4 erroneous either on fact or in law because the entire process of selection was contrary to the norms laid down in the 2006 Rules. That being so, this writ application is wholly misconceived and is, accordingly, dismissed. Ranjan (Mihir Kumar Jha, J)
Arguments
.... .... RESPONDENT/S =================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s:Mr. Uday Bhan Singh, Adv For the Respondent/s:Mrs. Kumari Amrita, Adv =================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MIHIR KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 2/ 26-07-2013 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Having regard to the following findings in the impugned order:- mYysf[kr dafMdk 4 ,oa 9 ds rn~uqlkj fdlh izdkj dh fu;kstu izfdz;k fu;ekuqdwy ugha dh xbZ gS A tSlk fd dafMdk 4 ds …d‰ [k.M&2 esa mYysf[kr gS fd iz’kf{kr ,oa vizf’kf{kr vH;fFkZ;ksa dh iSuy vyx&vyx rS;kj dh tk;xh A ijUrq fd mijksDr fu;kstu lfefr dh cSBd dh izfdz;k ls Li"V gS fd dqy vkosnu 1429 izkIr gqvk] ftldh dksbZ lwph fu;kstu bdkbZ esa rS;kj ugha dh ,oa vkSj ugha izf’kf{kr ,oa vizf’kf{kr vH;fFkZ;ksa dh iSuy lwph rS;kj fd;s A rS;kj lwph esa gq, fdlh izdkj dh =qfV;ksa ls mlds fujkdj.k gsrq ,d lIrkg dk le; vkifRr izkIr djus ds fy, fu/kkZfjr fd;k x;k ijUrq lfefr us ,slk dqN ugha fd;k gS blds vykos mu rS;kj vkifRr fujkdj.k ds ckn es|k vad ds vk/kkj ij vfUre es|k lwph vkj{k.k ,oa dksfVokj ds vuqlkj ugha cukbZ xbZ A fcuk bu lkjh izfdz;kvksa dks iqjk fd, fu;kstu lfefr us vkosnu ,oa izek.k i=ksa dk lR;kiu dh izfdz;k lh/ks izkjaHk dj nh tks iw.kZr% fu;e fo:) gS A lR;kiu dh izfdz;k dks ns[kus ls ;g Li"V gS fd fnukad 26-09-2006 ls 16-10-2006 rd tks viukbZ xbZ mlesa dbZ ckj ,d gh vH;fFkZ;ksa mifLFkr gq, gSa tks fu;e fo:) gS A bu izfdz;kvksa ds ckn fnukad 24-11-06 dks iSuy lfefr dh cSBd esa iSuy lfefr ds lnL;ksa dh cSBd esa loZlEefr ls jksLVj ,oa vkj{k.k fcUnqvksa dh en~nsutj j[krs gq, 27 vH;fFkZ;ksa dh lwph fu;kstu gsrq p;fur fd;k x;k ijUrq p;fur vH;fFkZ;ksa dh izrh{kk lwph rS;kj ugha dh xbZ cfYd fnukad 08-12-06 ds gq, iSuy lfefr dh cSBd esa fcuk jksLVj dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, flQZ lkekU; dksfV ds 6 vH;fFkZ;ksa dk p;fur lwph rS;kj dj yh xbZ gS] tcfd ,slh dksbZ izfr{kklwph fnukad 24-11-06 dh cSBd esa rS;kj djus dk izLrko ikfjr ugha fd;k x;k Fkk tSlkfd fnukad 24-11-06 dh cSBd esa rS;kj djus dk izLrko ikfjr ugha fd;k x;k Fkk tSlkfd fnukad 24- 11-06 dh cSBd esa izLrko ls Li"V fd;k x;k gS fd ;w0vkj0 ds 6 in] ;w0 vkj0,Q0 7 in] ch0lh0,Q0 1 in Lohd‘r gS ysfdu fu;kstu gsrq p;fur 27 vH;fFkZ;ksa dh lwph ds voyksdu ls ;g Patna High Court CWJC No.13954 of 2013 (2) dt.26-07-2013 3 izekf.kr gks jgk gS fd fu/kkZfjr jksLVj ,oa vkj{k.k fcUnq ds vuqlkj p;fur vH;fFkZ;ksa dh lwph rS;kj ugha dh xbZ gS A ;w0vkj0 esa 4 vH;FkhZ dk p;u fd;k x;k gS tcfd mlesa 6 dk gksuk fu/kkZfjr Fkk] mlh izdkj ;w0vkj0,Q0 esa 7 in fjDr gS ftuesa 8 vH;fFkZ;ksa dk p;u fd;k x;k gS] ch0lh0,Q0 esa 1 in fjDr gS blesa rhu vH;fFkZ;ksa dk p;u fd;k x;k gS] vkj0,Q0 dk 1 in fjDr gS mlesa fdlh vH;FkhZ dk p;u ugha fd;k x;k gS A fu;kstu gsrq p;fur 27 vH;fFkZ;ksa dh lwph izFke n‘"V;k esa gh iw.kZr% xyr gS A ,slh fLFkfr esa fu;kstu djuk Lor% xyr gS uk dksbZ izfr{kk lwph cukbZ x;h vkSj uk gh jksLVj ,oa vkj{k.k fcUnq dks en~nsutj j[krs gq, p;fur lwph cukbZ xbZ] cfYd euekus <ax ls ek= lkekU; dksfV esa 6 vH;fFkZ;ksa dh izfr{kk lwph rS;kj dj yh xbZ gS ftldk fu;kstu fnukad 15-12-2006 dks dj yh xbZ gS A (underlining for emphasis) this Court is not inclined to interfere with the impugned order of the Tribunal which has considered all the relevant aspects in view of the earlier order dated 12.12.2011 passed by