Anil Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
Case at a glance
Outcome
Dismissed
The petition is dismissed as not pressed
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 88. Ratnesh, Son of Shital Prasad Chaturvedi, Resident of Village – Laheri, Police Station – Srinagar, District – Mahoba (Uttar Pradesh), presently residing at Balaji Mandir, Street No. 2, R. Block, Bikash Nagar, New Delhi. .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance : : Mr. Pradeep Narain…
Judgment
Shital Prasad Chaturvedi, Son of Late Ramnath Chaturvedi, Resident of Village – Laheri, Police Station – Sri Nagar, District – Mahoba (Uttar Pradesh)., present residing at Balaji Mandir, Street No. 2, R. Block, Bikash Nagar, New Delhi.
Operative part
Ratnesh, Son of Shital Prasad Chaturvedi, Resident of Village – Laheri, Police Station – Srinagar, District – Mahoba (Uttar Pradesh), presently residing at Balaji Mandir, Street No. 2, R. Block, Bikash Nagar, New Delhi. .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance : : Mr. Pradeep Narain Kr., Advocate. For the Petitioner : Mr. Prasoon Sinha, GA-2. For the Respondent ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHYAM KISHORE SHARMA HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR TRIVEDI ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHYAM KISHORE SHARMA) 5 01-05-2013 The victim has been traced out and her statement under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. has been recorded and it has been brought on record through a counter affidavit filed on behalf of the respondent no. 5, the Superintendent of Police, Begusarai. In view of the earlier development, learned Counsel Patna High Court CR. WJC No.261 of 2013 (5) dt.01-05-2013 2 for the petitioner does not want to press this writ application. The petition is dismissed as not pressed. (Shyam Kishore Sharma, J.) KKSINHA/- (Aditya Kumar Trivedi, J.)
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The petition is dismissed as not pressed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 164.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.