Ram Pravesh Yadav v. The State of Bihar
Case at a glance
Outcome
Allowed
The application stands allowed
Provisions considered
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 ss. 3(5), 109(1), 115(2), 118(2), 126(2), 303(2), 351(2), 352
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 438(2)
Key paragraphs
- Para 66. The application stands allowed. (Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T
Judgment
2. Mukesh yadav S/o Ram Pravesh Yadav R/o Village- Jaharbigha, PS- Ashthawan, District- Nalanda
3. Anuj Yadav @ Anoj Yadav S/o Ram Pravesh Yadav R/o Village- Jaharbigha, PS- Ashthawan, District- Nalanda
4. Kamlesh Yadav @ Kamlesh S/o Ram Pravesh Yadav R/o Village- Jaharbigha, PS- Ashthawan, District- Nalanda The State of Bihar Versus ... ... Petitioner/s ... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : For the Opposite Party/s : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA Mr. Raj Kishor Prasad Mr. Shyam Kumar Singh ORAL ORDER 2 16-07-2025
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
The petitioners seek bail in anticipation of their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 352, 109(1), 303(2), 351(2), 118(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S.
The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have antecedent of three cases and the informant alleges that on account of dispute relating to property, the occurrence is alleged to have taken place and the accused Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44077 of 2025(2) dt.16-07-2025 persons including the petitioners are alleged to have assaulted the informant and his nephew. It is next submitted that from perusal of the injury report of the injured annexed as Annexure- 3, it would manifest that the injury suffered by the injured is simple in nature.
Learned A.P.P. opposes the anticipatory bail application.
Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners, above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, are directed to be released on anticipatory bail on their furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Biharsharif, Nalanda in connection with Asthawan P. S. Case No.88 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.
Operative part
The application stands allowed. (Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The application stands allowed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — ss. 3(5), 109(1), 115(2), 118(2), 126(2), 303(2), 351(2), 352; Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 438(2).
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.