Champaran v. The State Of Bihar
Case at a glance
- Bench
- SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 147, 307, 323, 324, 341, 354, 379, 504, 506
Judgment
====================================================== Appearance : Mr.Bal Govind Sharma For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Anita Kumari For the Opposite Party/s : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 2 21-07-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State. The petitioners have prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 147, 341, 323, 324, 307, 354, 379, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. As per prosecution case, the allegation against the accused persons including the petitioner is that they armed with various weapons came at the house of the informant and started assaulting the informant and his family members due to which informant’s side sustained injuries. It is further alleged that they also took away cash of Rs. 4500 from the pocket of the informant. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43695 of 2023(2) dt.21-07-2023 Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. They have falsely been implicated in this case due to passage dispute. There is case and counter case between the parties and both parties have sustained injuries in separate occurrence. They have got no criminal antecedent. It is further submitted that the petitioners are languishing in judicial custody since 03.04.2023. Learned APP appearing for the state has opposed the prayer of regular bail. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as custody of the petitioners, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The above named petitioners are directed to be released on bail in connection with Turkauliay P.S. Case No. 397 of 2023 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, East Champaran, Motihari Manishkumar/- U (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.