Md. Shamim v. The State of Bihar
Case at a glance
- Bench
- CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
Provisions considered
- Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 ss. 30(a), 32, 41
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 120B, 420, 467, 468, 471
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 437(3)
Key paragraphs
- Para 88. Considering the facts and circumstances as Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45536 of 2023(2) dt.03-08-2023 mentioned above as alleged recovery of illicit liquor not appears to be made from the conscious physical possession of petitioners, coupled with the fact that charge-sheet has already submitted…
Judgment
Mr.Jagnnath Singh, Advocate Md. Ghulam Mustafa, Advocate Ms. Jyoti Joshi, Advocate Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Advocate Mr.Manoj Kumar, APP For the Opposite Party/s : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER 2 03-08-2023 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.
Let the defect(s), if any, be removed within a period of four weeks from today.
The petitioners seek bail in connection with Baheri P.S. Case No. 147 of 2023 registered for the offence under Sections 30(a)/32, 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 read with Section 120B, 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code.
The accused/petitioners are named in the F.I.R. and are in custody since 12.05.2023. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45536 of 2023(2) dt.03-08-2023
The allegation against the petitioner is to be engaged in illegal trading/manufacturing of illicit liquor, where, there is recovery of 1332.615 litres of foreign liquor from the alleged vehicles.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are the residents near to place of recovery, where as matter of chance, they were present on the place of recovery and on the basis of said suspicion only, they were implicated with present case, where in furtherance thereof, no incriminating material recovered/surfaced during the course of investigation as to suggest involvement of petitioners prima facie with present recovery of illicit liquor. It is also submitted that seizure list also appearing doubtful being not supported by independent witnesses, rather by police personnels. While concluding the argument, it is submitted that petitioner no. 1 is a man of clean antecedent and petitioner no. 2 found involved in one more criminal case, where he is on bail, and moreover, investigation of this case is completed, for which charge-sheet has been submitted, as such, there is no chance of tampering with the evidence.
Learned APP, opposes the prayer of bail.
Considering the facts and circumstances as Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45536 of 2023(2) dt.03-08-2023 mentioned above as alleged recovery of illicit liquor not appears to be made from the conscious physical possession of petitioners, coupled with the fact that charge-sheet has already submitted, where petitioners are in custody since 12.05.2023, accordingly, petitioners above named, is directed to be released on bail in connection with Baheri P.S. Case No. 147 of 2023 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Exclusive Special Judge-I, (Excise Act), Darbhanga/concerned Court, subject to the conditions as mentioned under Section 437(3) of the Cr.P.C. veena/- U T (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.