SHEO KUMAR SHARMA v. THE STATE OF BIHAR & Ors.
Case at a glance
- Decided
- 24 Nov 2009
- Bench
- N SINGH
Judgment
RAVI SHANKAR SAH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS CWJC No.8977 of 2006 ANIL KUMAR SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS CWJC No.10341 of 2006 BASANTI DEVI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS CWJC No.10371 of 2006 MUNI RAM Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS CWJC No.11111 of 2006 STYA DEO SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS CWJC No.11580 of 2006 BALESHWAR SHARMA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS CWJC No.12576 of 2006 ARJUN SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS CWJC No.12674 of 2006 MUNDRIKA SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS CWJC No.13034 of 2006 ASIDEO SHARMA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS CWJC No.13287 of 2006 ANANDIT PRASAD SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS CWJC No.14370 of 2006 OM PRAKASH ALOK Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS CWJC No.430 of 2007 RAJ KUMAR PRASAD Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS CWJC No.2080 of 2007 SMT.KRISHNA DEVI Versus - 3 - THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS CWJC No.2820 of 2007 LAKSHMI PANDIT Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS CWJC No.3753 of 2007 LAKSHMI NARAIN SHARMA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS CWJC No.4655 of 2007 SUSHIL JHA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS CWJC No.5395 of 2007 SAKHI CHAND MODI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS CWJC No.6284 of 2007 KALESHWAR SHARMA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS CWJC No.8003 of 2007 RAM CHARITRA SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS CWJC No.8752 of 2007 SRI SURYA KUMAR SINGH @ SURAJ Versus THE UNION OF INDIA & ORS CWJC No.8799 of 2007 RAMPRATAP SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS CWJC No.11941 of 2007 MUNI LAL BHAGAT Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS CWJC No.12164 of 2007 DR.VIJAY KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS CWJC No.12611 of 2007 MANGAL PRASAD VERMA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS CWJC No.13506 of 2007 MARUT NANDAN PRASAD Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS - 4 - CWJC No.13941 of 2007 YADUNANDAN PRASAD Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS CWJC No.13961 of 2007 MOSTT.RUKHI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS CWJC No.14554 of 2007 SHIO SHANKAR PRASAD Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS CWJC No.16271 of 2007 JAGNATH SHARMA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS CWJC No.16940 of 2007 BALMIKI SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS CWJC No.17148 of 2007 MOSMAT BINDA DEVI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS CWJC No.306 of 2008 URMILA DEVI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS CWJC No.1754 of 2008 PRADYUMAN PRASAD SHAH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS CWJC No.2215 of 2008 LALITA DEVI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS CWJC No.3933 of 2008 GAURI SHANKAR JHA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS CWJC No.4067 of 2008 RAM PUJAN RAI Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS CWJC No.5328 of 2008 SHANKAR MAHTO Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS CWJC No.5333 of 2008 CHHAVINATH SHARMA - 5 - Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS CWJC No.6287 of 2008 DINESH PRASAD SHARMA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS CWJC No.6324 of 2008 JAG NARAYAN SINGH Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS CWJC No.9235 of 2008 KUMAR RAMESHWAR LAL DAS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS CWJC No.10058 of 2008 SAKET KUMAR Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS CWJC No.11776 of 2008 BAIDYA NATH LAL DAS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS CWJC No.12001 of 2008 NAND LAL BAITHA Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS CWJC No.12590 of 2008 CHANDERDEO PRASAD Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS CWJC No.12730 of 2008 BABU PRASAD JHA & ORS Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS CWJC No.12773 of 2008 BRAHMADEO PRASAD Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS -----------
24/11/2009 All these writ applications were disposed of by order dated 29.8.2008 with certain directions. Thereafter, matters were ordered to be listed under the heading “To Be Mentioned” for reporting compliance. - 6 - In all these cases, petitioners have filed affidavit that, in spite of directions of this Court, same have not been complied with by the concerned District Provident Fund Officers. However, this Court does not intend to proceed in the matter in a batch. Therefore, these matters are closed. Petitioners shall be liberty separate contempt applications in case they find that the directions of this Court have not been complied with by the concerned District Provident Fund Officers in their respective cases. Pradeep/ (J. N. Singh, J.)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.