Ram Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 379, 411
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 438(2)
Judgment
Nitish Kumar Son of Gauri Shankar R/O Village-Gadhochak, P.S.- Nadi, District- Patna The State Of Bihar Versus ... ... Petitioner/s ... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : : For the Petitioner/s For the Opposite Party/s : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER Mr.Vijay Anand Mr.Rajendra Prasad Nat 2 24-07-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence under Sections 379 / 411 of the Indian Penal Code.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have been made accused in this case on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused Pintu Rai and Rajesh Rai with the allegation that these petitioners helped them in parking the alleged tractor. Petitioners claim clean antecedent.
Learned A.P.P. for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioners. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46787 of 2024(2) dt.24-07-2024
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the above named petitioners, in the event of their arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Patna City (Patna) in connection with Nadi P.S. Case No. 372 of 2023, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.