Harendra Thakur v. The State Of Bihar
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 34, 307, 324
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 438(2)
Judgment
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 02/ 08-08-2012 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 324 and 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation is of making assault with Axe, Dab and lathi. One injury has been found to be grievous. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that accusation is not specific and there is a counter version of the occurrence also when petitioners’ side also received injuries. A supplementary affidavit has been filed that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.26959 of 2012 (2) dt.08-08-2012 named petitioners be released on anticipatory bail in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj in connection with Sidhwalia P.S. Case No. 55 of 2012, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. DKS/ (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J.) .
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.