✦ Patna High Court

Sanjay Kumar Mahto v. The State of Bihar

AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 41555 of 2023SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Judgment

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : For the Opposite Party/s : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR Mr. Nilendu Kumar Choudhary, Advocate Mr. Parmanand Prasad, APP ORAL ORDER 3 19-07-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 363, 366, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The allegation against the petitioner along with others is of kidnapping the daughter of the informant, when she was alone in her house. It is further alleged that the co-accused will sale her daughter or co-accused Ganesh Dhankar forcibly marry with her. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He has committed no offence. The victim girl has recovered and her statement recorded u/s 164 of the Cr.P.C., in which she Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41555 of 2023(3) dt.19-07-2023 whispered about the complicity of co-accused Ganesh Dhankar, who forcibly taken away her to Samastipur and filled vermillion (sindoor) in her forehead. She further stated that the co-accused Ganesh Dhankar, kept her in a room. She stated that this petitioner along with other were only seat inside the car. There is no specific overt act against this petitioner. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail petition. He is languishing in judicial custody since 13.05.2023. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as period of custody, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court concerned in connection with Kamtaul P.S. Case No. 22 of 2023. arish/- U T (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Patna High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 41555 of 2023). ← Search more judgments