Samastipur v. The State of Bihar
Case at a glance
- Bench
- ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN
Outcome
Dismissed
This instant application is dismissed
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 363, 366
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 164
Judgment
Operative part
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : For the Opposite Party/s : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER Mr. Anish Kumar Mr. Shantanu Kumar 2 24-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defects within four weeks. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 363, 366 of IPC. Allegedly, the married daughter of informant moved from her matrimonial house with her son without informing anyone. The informant further alleged that took Rs.50,000/- and goldent ornaments worth Rs.1 lac with her. The informant raised suspicion that her daughter might be killed by the hand of greedy person. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40434 of 2022(2) dt.24-11-2022 petitioner is quite innocent and have committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. No such occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. The petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and his name has been surfaced during the course of investigation. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail by submitting that the name of the petitioner has been surfaced in statement of the victim recorded u/s 164 Cr.P.C. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner named above on bail. The prayer for grant of anticipatory bail on behalf of the petitioner is rejected. This instant application is dismissed. shikha/- U T (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: This instant application is dismissed
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 363, 366; Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 164.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.