Rajesh Kumar Singh v. Ram Naresh Kumar Sinha @ Ram Naresh Thakur
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
Cause title
====================================================== Sri Arun Yadav @ Arun Kumar S/O Dev Narayan Yadav Resident Of Village- Sisona, P.S.- Mahishi & District- Saharsas. The State Of Bihar
Versus
.... Petitioner
/s .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== With Criminal Miscellaneous No.47853 of 2012 ====================================================== Parmanand Sah, son of Sri Nageshwar Sah, Permanent resident of village – Affour, East Tola, P.O. + P.S. – Khaire, District – Saran at Chapra. At present working on the post of DCLR, Haveli Kharagpur, Munger (still in Service).
Versus
.... Petitioner
/s The State Of Bihar 2 ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AKHILESH CHANDRA
ORAL ORDER ....
.... Opposite Party/s 13 12-11-2013 Supplementary affidavits have been filed in Cr. Misc. No. 42322/2012 and Cr. Misc. No. 47853/2012. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with a case registered for the offence punishable under 406, 409, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code. All the five petitioners are named accused in this case being Block Development Officer during relevant period, Mukhiya and employee of the Bank. In this case arising out of some alleged irregularity and defalcation in execution of Indira Awas Scheme. Submission is of false implication and as regard to petitioner Rajesh Kumar Singh during entire investigation and supervision by superiors absolutely nothing has been found, ultimately investigating agency has been directed to submit final form against him. Further, it is submitted that petitioner Arun Kumar is the Mukhiya elected much after the period during which alleged defalcation etc. were made. It is further submitted that the beneficiaries have come forward with the statement during investigation that they have withdrawn the money as awarded to 3 them without any obstruction or parting with etc. There is nothing against either of five petitioners. Some of the accused have already been granted the privilege by a Bench of this court. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within four weeks, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa, in connection with Mahishi P.S. Case No. 19 of 2012, subject to condition laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure with additional condition to remain physically present before the court below on each and every date at least for two years or till disposal of the case, whichever is earlier and in case of failure on two consecutive dates without giving any reasonable explanation, the liberty granted shall be deemed to be cancelled. Rajeev/- (Akhilesh Chandra, J)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.