✦ Patna High Court

BIRENDRA PRASAD SINHA v. THE INDIA

Case at a glance

Outcome

Disposed of

petition stands disposed of

Provisions considered

Judgment

Mr. Shailendra Kumar Sinha, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner fairly stated that there has been notification under Section 14 of the Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985, whereby B.S.N.L. has been brought within the net of the jurisdiction of the Central Administrative Tribunal. Regard being had to the aforesaid subsequent - 2 - event and keeping in view the law laid down in I.Chandra Kumar v. Union of India and Others, AIR 1997 Supreme Court 1125, validity of the Rule can be challenged before the Tribunal. Thus, the petitioner should challenge constitutional validity of the Rule in question before the Tribunal and thereafter if circumstances so arise may approach this Court under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition stands disposed of. (Dipak Misra, CJ) (Rakesh Kumar, J) Pawan/-

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: petition stands disposed of

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985 — s. 14; Constitution of India — arts. 226, 227.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Patna High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No. 2877 of 2007). ← Search more judgments