✦ Patna High Court

MD.MURTUZA HUSSAIN v. THE STATE OF BIHAR & Ors.

JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No. 13666 of 2007NAVANITI PRASAD SINGH3 min read

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Judgment

confirm to be of fairness and reasonableness. Here, clearly the actions have been not only unfair but unreasonable and thus the direction is aforesaid. The petitioner would thus be entitled to get revalidated cheque forthwith, as noticed above along with simple interest @ 6% per annum from the time payment was issued from the date of cheque. Which payment should be made by cheque in favour of the petitioner within a period of one month by the respondent-Executive Engineer, Muzaffarpur Division of the Bihar State Housing Board. The writ petition thus stands allowed. Trivedi/ (Navaniti Prasad Singh,J.)

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Patna High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No. 13666 of 2007). ← Search more judgments