✦ Patna High Court

SUKHDEO PANDIT v. RAJENDRA RAI@RAJENDRA YADAV & Ors.

JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R No. 1061 of 2008MIHIR KUMAR JHA

Case at a glance

Outcome

Dismissed

application is dismissed

Provisions considered

Judgment

Operative part

plaintiff petitioner is the only sufferer. The court below is directed to ensure that miscellaneous case filed by Ramkaran Rai must be taken up expeditiously and disposed of within a period of three 2 months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. With aforementioned observations, revision application is dismissed. ( Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: application is dismissed

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 — O. 9 r. 13.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Patna High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R No. 1061 of 2008). ← Search more judgments