✦ Patna High Court

MD.NASEEM v. THE STATE OF BIHAR

JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No. 10541 of 2003RAMESH KUMAR DATTA

Case at a glance

Bench
RAMESH KUMAR DATTA

Provisions considered

Judgment

confiscation there is provision for appeal under Section 52A of the Act. In view of the aforesaid statutory remedies available the writ application appears to be misconceived and it is, accordingly, dismissed. It would, however, be open to the petitioner to pursue his remedies before the statutory authorities. In case the petitioner approaches the statutory authorities along with a copy of this order the statutory authorities shall consider his case in accordance with law keeping in view that the petitioner has been pursuing his remedies before this Court in this writ petition. spal/ (Ramesh Kumar Datta,J.)

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Patna High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No. 10541 of 2003). ← Search more judgments