Baldeo Prasad Chaudhary v. Munari Kuer & Ors.
Case at a glance
- Bench
- V NATH
Provisions considered
- Constitution of India art. 227
Judgment
.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dineshwar Mishra For the Respondent/s : Mr. Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V. NATH ORAL ORDER 3 28-03-2012 Mr. Dineshwar Mishra, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits impugned order interlocutory in nature and the revision application is not maintainable. He has prayed to convert this revision application into an application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India in view of the law laid down by a Division Bench of this Court in Durga Devi Vs. Vijay Kumar Poddar, reported in 2010(2) PLJR 954. The learned counsel for opposite party nos. 1,4,5,7 and 39 is also present. The prayer is allowed. The petitioner is granted four weeks time to convert this revision application into an application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, failing which this application shall stand rejected without further reference to the bench. Nitesh/- (V. Nath, J)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.