✦ Patna High Court

Phulwanti Devi v. Welfare, Government of Bihar

JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No. 3385 of 2009AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI

Case at a glance

Outcome

Dismissed

The writ application stands dismissed

Provisions considered

Judgment

Operative part

and learned counsel for the State. The order passed by the District Magistrate has been duly examined by the Appellate Authority i.e. the Divisional Commissioner, Munger. This Court does not find any illegality and irrationality in the said order. The reasoning given in the order is based on materials on which action has been taken. The order requires no interference, more so when petitioner wants reappraisal of evidence afresh under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The writ application stands dismissed. Shageer (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J)

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: The writ application stands dismissed

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Constitution of India — art. 226.

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Patna High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. JUDICATURE AT PATNA CWJC No. 3385 of 2009). ← Search more judgments