✦ Patna High Court

Sanjit Kumar Pandit @ Sanjit Pandit v. The State of Bihar

AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 37847 of 2022ANSHUMAN3 min read

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Judgment

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37847 of 2022(3) dt.17-11-2022 to kill. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He further submits that the allegation against the younger brother is to kill the father. Learned counsel submits that the pairvikar of this case is mother of the informant and accused, and she has narrated the circumstance, in which the present F.I.R. has been lodged, she has categorically stated that the informant put greedy eyes on the property in possession of his father and he persuade his parent to transfer the said property, either in his name or in the name of his wife but the mother of informant was not ready for the same and in result, the present event took place. He further submits that petitioner is in custody since 13.09.2021 and charge sheet has already been filed in this case. He also submits that there is one case pending against the petitioner, in which he is on bail.

Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that bail application of petitioner may be rejected. In the present facts and circumstances of this case and the submissions made above, let the petitioner above named, be granted bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.30,000/- (Rupees Thirty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Purnia in connection with S.T. No. 125 of 2022 arising out of K.Hat Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37847 of 2022(3) dt.17-11-2022 (Madhubani T.O.P.) P.S. Case No. 841 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 437(3) of Cr.P.C. with other following conditions: A. The petitioner shall support in trial and shall appear physically before the lower court on each and every date fixed, in case of non-appearance for two consecutive dates without sufficient cause, shall be resulted into cancellation of his bail bond.

B. One of the bailors shall be close relative who shall file an affidavit before the court about his relationship with the petitioner. C. The petitioner shall file an affidavit at the time of furnishing of bail bond that he shall not involve in such criminal activity during the continuance of present bail bond, violation of this condition shall be resulted into cancellation of his present bail bond. allowed. With this observation, the bail application stands ritik/- U T (Dr. Anshuman, J.)

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Patna High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 37847 of 2022). ← Search more judgments