✦ Patna High Court

Ram Namuna Singh v. Ram Razi Kunwar & Ors.

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Judgment

Mr. Kumar Sunil, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the impugned order is interlocutory in nature and the revision application is not maintainable and therefore, he should be granted permission to convert this revision application into an application under article 227 in view of the decision by a Division Bench of this Court in Durga Devi Vs. Vijay Kumar Poddar, reported in 2010(2) PLJR 954. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite party is also present. Permission is accorded. The petitioner is granted four weeks time to convert this revision application into an application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, failing which this application shall stand rejected without further reference to the bench. (V. Nath, J.) Saif/-

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Patna High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Civil Revision No. 1168 of 2009). ← Search more judgments