✦ Patna High Court

Most. Chandrawati & Anr. v. Rama Shankar Sah & Anr.

Civil Revision No. 1857 of 2009VIJAYENDRA NATH

Case at a glance

Bench
VIJAYENDRA NATH

Provisions considered

Judgment

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Tiwari For the Respondent/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYENDRA NATH ORAL ORDER 2 05-03-2012 Mr. Umesh Tiwari, the learned counsel appearing on behalf the petitioners submits impugned order interlocutory in nature and the revision application is not maintainable. He has prayed to convert this revision application into an application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India in view of the law laid down by a Division Bench of this Court in Durga Devi Vs. Vijay Kumar Poddar, reported in 2010 (2) PLJR 954. The prayer is allowed. The petitioners are granted four weeks time to convert this revision application into an application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, failing which this application shall stand rejected without further reference to the bench. Devendra/- (Vijayendra Nath, J)

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Patna High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Civil Revision No. 1857 of 2009). ← Search more judgments