Rambilash Chaudhary v. The State of Bihar BIHAR
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 ss. 30(a), 47
Judgment
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : For the Opposite Party/s : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN Mr.Man Mohan Kumar Mr.Nitya Nand Tiwary ORAL ORDER 2 30-05-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Nawada Excise P.S. Case No. 248 of 2024 lodged on
03.04.2024 under Section 30(a), 47 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.
As per the prosecution case, F.I.R. has been lodged against four named accused persons including the present petitioner and recovery of total 180 litre of wine has been the subject matter of this case.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Counsel also submits that the said recovery was made on motorcycle at public place and he is resident of nearby village. Counsel further Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40566 of 2024(2) dt.30-05-2024 submits that the criminal antecedent of the petitioner is clean and the petitioner is in custody since 04.04.2024.
Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.
In the present facts and circumstances of this case and the submissions made above, let the petitioner above named by granted bail after framing of charge, if the charge is not framed yet and on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 30,000/- (Rupees Thirty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Exclusive Special Court Excise-2, Nawada in connection with Nawada Excise P.S. Case No. 248 of 2024 subject to the condition laid down under Section 437(3). Sunnykr/- U (Dr. Anshuman, J)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.