✦ Patna High Court

Ram Gulam Yadav v. The State of Bihar

AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 51873 of 2024ARUN KUMAR JHA2 min read

Case at a glance

Judgment

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : For the Opposite Party/s : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA Mr. Bimal Kumar Jha, Advocate Mr. Yogendra Kumar, APP ORAL ORDER 2 21-08-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

02.

In the present case, the petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Ladaniya P.S. Case No. 125 of 2021 registered for the alleged offence under Sections 272 & 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

03.

As per prosecution case, two motorcycles were intercepted by the SSB personnel and the riders tried to escape. However, one rider from each motorcycle was chased and apprehended. Recovery of 30 bottles of 300 ml of Nepali country made liquor was made from each motorcycle. The petitioner is said to be the owner of one of the motorcycles.

04.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51873 of 2024(2) dt.21-08-2024 petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. The petitioner is not named in the FIR. On the date of occurrence, the petitioner went to participate in a marriage ceremony at his matrimonial place where co-accused, Pramod Yadav, took motorcycle of the petitioner for marketing work. However, co- accused Pramod Yadav, used the motorcycle for illegal purposes and this wrong doing was not in knowledge of the petitioner. Further, the apprehended co-accused did not name the petitioner for being involved in the alleged occurrence. The petitioner is having clean antecedent and he has no concern with the seized liquor.

05.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.

06.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances and submission made on behalf of the parties and considering the remoteness of allegation against the petitioner and possibility of false accusation, let the petitioner above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court concerned within a period of eight weeks from today, be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional District & Sessions Judge-II-cum-Special Judge (Excise Act), Madhubani in connection with Ladania P.S. Case No. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51873 of 2024(2) dt.21-08-2024 125 of 2021, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and other following conditions: (i) One of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner. (ii) The petitioner will remain present on each and every date fixed by the court below, if so required by the learned trial court. (Arun Kumar Jha, J) Ashish/- U T

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Patna High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 51873 of 2024). ← Search more judgments