PRADEEP SAHNI @ AMIT SAHNI @ GORAKH v. THE STATE OF BIHAR
Case at a glance
Outcome
Allowed
Accordingly, the appeal is allowed and the
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 34, 372, 376
- Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 ss. 3(2)(v), 3(i)(v)
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 164
Judgment
====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s For the Respondent/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR Mr.Harish Kumar Mr.Usha Kumari 1 : : 4 14-12-2023 Though notice has been issued to O.P. No. 2, no one ORAL ORDER has turned to assist the Court. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned Special Public Prosecutor for the State. The instant appeal has been filed by the appellant against the order dated 10.06.2020 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge 1st, Patna in Spl. Case No. 234 of 2019 whereby the prayer for bail of the appellant in connection with Ram Krishna Nagar P.S. Case no. 809 of 2019 under Sections 372, 376/34 of the Indian Penal Code and sections 4, 10 and 16 of the POSCO Act and Sections 3(i)(v), 3(2)(v) of the SC/ST Act was rejected. Earlier appellant had moved for grant of regular bail but the same was rejected by another co-ordinate Bench of this Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.3310 of 2021(4) dt.14-12-2023 court vide order dated 12.01.2021 passed in Cr.
Appeal (SJ) No. 1865 of 2020. As per allegation in the FIR, due to cruel behavior of mother of the informant, she along with her friend had fled away from their respective houses and reached to the house of Pooja Kumari, with whom both were well acquainted. Pooja Kumari assured her for providing job in Mall. But they came to know that Pooja Kumari and her husband (appellant) run a brothel and they forced the victims for flesh trade. They were physically abused several times at brothel. It is further alleged that appellant with his wife Pooja Kumari brought one of the victim girl to bus stand for selling her in two lacs rupees but having got this knowledge, both victims fled away and informed the police. It is submitted by learned counsel for the appellant that appellant has been falsely implicated in this case. Specific allegation is against Pooja Kumari and not against the appellant. Appellant is husband of main accused Pooja Kumari.
Statement of both the victim girls were recorded u/s 164 Cr.P.C. in which they have not made allegation of sexual assault or physical assault against the appellant. No offence is made out under the provisions of the SC/ST Act against them. He has got no Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.3310 of 2021(4) dt.14-12-2023 criminal antecedent and languishing in judicial custody since
Operative part
26.4.2020. The appeal for bail is opposed by learned Spl. P.P. for the State. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration that there is general and omnibus allegation against the appellant, the Court is inclined to allow this appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed and the impugned order dated 10.06.2020 is hereby set aside. The appellant is directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with Ram Krishna Nagar PS Case No. 809 of 2019 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-1, Patna. sushma/- U (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: Accordingly, the appeal is allowed and the
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 34, 372, 376; Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 — ss. 3(2)(v), 3(i)(v); Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 164.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.