✦ Patna High Court

Champaran v. The State of Bihar

AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 43391 of 2021RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD4 min read

Case at a glance

Bench
RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD

Outcome

Disposed of

The application stands disposed of accordingly

Provisions considered

Judgment

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : For the Opposite Party/s : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER Mr. Bimlesh Kumar Pandey, Advocate Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, APP 3 23-03-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, learned APP for the State. The petitioner in the present case is seeking regular bail in connection with Bettiah (Town) P.S. Case No. 96 of 2021 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 413, 414/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1-b)a, 26 of the Arms Act. He has three criminal antecedents and has remained in custody since 11.02.2021. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as per the prosecution story, the informant got secret information that two suspicious persons were sitting near Rajdevri Sarvoday School on a motorcycle to commit some offence.

On this information, the informant reached there and on seeing the police party two persons tried to flee but got apprehended. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43391 of 2021(3) dt.23-03-2022 Apprehended accused persons disclosed their names as Lal Mohammad @ Anil Miya (this petitioner) and Mojahid Miya and on search of the person of this petitioner one country-made pistol loaded with one cartridge was recovered and one master key from the pocket of Mojahid Miya. On the confessional statement of the petitioner, two motorcycles were recovered from his house and two other motorcycles have been recovered from possession of two accused. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. It is submitted that co-accused similarly situated have already been granted bail by learned Co-ordinate Benches of this Court. The petitioner is in custody since 11.02.2021.

Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner. Having regard to the submission that from possession of the petitioner allegedly one country-made pistol loaded with one cartridge was recovered and then on the basis of his confessional statement two stolen motorcycles were recovered from his house and two other motorcycles have been recovered from possession of the two accused but the petitioner is in custody in connection with this case for over one year and the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43391 of 2021(3) dt.23-03-2022 co-accused similarly situated, namely, Brij Kumar @ Brij Kumar Chaudhary and Mahanth Mahto @ Mahanth Mahato have been granted bail by learned Co-ordinate Benches in Cr. Misc. No. 40701 of 2021 and Cr. Misc. No. 39213 of 2021 respectively, this Court directs release of the petitioner above name on bail on furnishing of bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Bettiah, West Champaran in connection with Bettiah (Town) P.S. Case No.

96 of 2021, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 437(3) Cr.P.C. And considering the nature of the criminal antecedents of the petitioner and his repeated indulgence in the similar kind of offence, this Court directs that till conclusion of the trial in the present case the petitioner shall attend the concerned police station, namely, P.S.-Manuapul in the District of West Champaran once in every two months, his attendance shall be recorded by the S.H.O. of Manuapul Police Station. The petitioner shall keep on furnishing complete information with regard to his whereabouts during course of trial and default on this account shall lead to an action towards cancellation of bail of the petitioner. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43391 of 2021(3) dt.23-03-2022 And further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take steps for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner.

Operative part

However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification. The application stands disposed of accordingly. SUSHMA2/- U T (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) Note: The order sheet duly signed has been attached with the record. However, in view of the present arrangements, during Pandemic period all concerned shall act on the basis of the copy of the order uploaded on the High Court website under the heading ‘Judicial Orders Passed During The Pandemic Period’.

Questions this judgment answers

What did the Court decide in this case?

The Court recorded the following disposition: The application stands disposed of accordingly

Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?

Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 34, 413, 414; Arms Act, 1959; Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 437(3).

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Patna High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 43391 of 2021). ← Search more judgments