Mamta Devi v. The State of Bihar
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s For the Respondent/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR Mr. Binay Kumar, Advocate Mr. Standing Counsel (22) : : ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH) 3 19-01-2026 Though the present writ petition has been filed for quashing the order dated 14.01.2025 passed by the Excise Commissioner, Bihar, Patna in Excise Appeal Case No. 119 of 2024 as also the order dated 16.10.2024 passed by the learned Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Sadar Bhagalpur in Miscellaneous (Excise) Case No. 144 of 2022-2023, however, at the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to challenge the aforesaid appellate order Patna High Court CWJC No.10423 of 2025(3) dt.19-01-2026 dated 14.01.2025 by filing appropriate revision petition under Section 93 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. Liberty so sought is granted.
It is needless to say that in case appropriate revision petition is filed within a period of four weeks from today, the Revisional Authority shall examine the same on merits without being impeded by the issue of limitation and pass a reasoned and a speaking order, in accordance with law within a period of six weeks, thereafter.
Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed off on the aforesaid terms. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) ( Praveen Kumar, J) shivam/- U T
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.