Arjun Kumar v. The State of Bihar
Case at a glance
- Bench
- ANSHUMAN
Provisions considered
- Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022 s. 30(a)
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 437(3)
Judgment
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : For the Opposite Party/s : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN Mr. Anuj Kumar, Advocate Mr. Md. Iftekhar Mahmood, APP ORAL ORDER 2 27-05-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Motihari Excise P.S. Case No. 669 of 2024 lodged on
16.04.2024, under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022.
As per the prosecution, FIR has been lodged against the petitioner and a total recovery is 180 litres of illicit liquor has been subject matter of the present case.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He further submits that the antecedent of the petitioner is clean and he is in custody since 17.04.2024. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the recovery has not been made from his Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38791 of 2024(2) dt.27-05-2024 conscious possession rather police has apprehended him when the real accused person has fled away and petitioner was just a passer by.
Learned counsel for the state opposes the prayer for bail and submits that petitioner has been arrested on spot.
In the present facts and circumstances of this case and the submissions made above, let the petitioner above named be granted bail, but only after framing of charge, if not framed, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 30,000/- (Rupees Thirty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court of Exclusive Special Excise Court No.02, East Champaran at Motihari, in connection with Motihari Excise P.S. Case No. 669 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down U/S 437(3) Cr.P.C. (Dr. Anshuman, J) ravikr/- U T
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.