DIPAK KUMAR v. The State of Bihar Bihar
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 147, 148, 149, 307, 323, 324, 341, 379, 504
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 438(2)
Judgment
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : For the Opposite Party/s : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER Mr.Santosh Kumar Mr.Md. Aslam Ansari 2 15-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 504 of the IPC. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that specific accusation of assault is against co-accused Sanjay Mahto and Balindar Mahto. There is no allegation of committing over act against the petitioner. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of the case, in the event of arrest/surrender within six weeks from today, let the petitioner, Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34007 of 2022(2) dt.15-11-2022 above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, 1st West, Muzaffarpur in connection with Kudhni P.S. Case No. 379 of 2021 subject to the conditions laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. asmit/- U T (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.