JITENDRA KUMAR @ GOLU @ CHOCHWA @ GOLU KUMAR v. THE STATE OF BIHAR
Case at a glance
- Bench
- SATYAVRAT VERMA
Provisions considered
- Bihar Excise Act s. 30(a)
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 438(2)
Judgment
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : For the Opposite Party/s : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA Mr. Sheo Kumar Prasad Mr. Bishweshwar Ram ORAL ORDER 2 25-05-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and allegation is of recovery of 873 liters of liquor from a pickup van and 180 liters of liquor from a truck. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was not apprehended from the spot as such nothing was recovered from his conscious possession, it is next submitted that the petitioner is not the owner of the seized Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33654 of 2023(2) dt.25-05-2023 vehicle and he came to be implicated based on the secret information which is the easiest way to implicate someone when admittedly, the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 1,000/- (Rupees One Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Warisnagar P.S. Case No. 94 of 2023 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. HarshPandey/- U T (Satyavrat Verma, J)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.