Vikash Kumar v. The State of Bihar
Case at a glance
- Bench
- AJIT KUMAR
Provisions considered
Judgment
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : For the Opposite Party/s : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR Mr. Prabhat Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. Md. Shakir Ahmad, APP ORAL ORDER 2 21-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Chandi P.S. Case No. 51 of 2026 dated
06.04.2026 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act,
As per prosecution case, the Police have recovered total 250 liters of illicit country-made Mahuwa wine from two bikes bearing Regd. No. BR03V-1465 (Honda Shine bike) and BR01DJ-9235 (Passion Pro bike). Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33997 of 2026(2) dt.21-05-2026
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in the present case. It is next submitted that the recovery has been made from the motorcycles, none of which are owned by the petitioners and the seized articles are in no way connected with the petitioners. It has further been submitted that merely because of antecedent of the petitioner no.1, all the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case while the petitioner nos. 2 & 3 have no criminal antecedent.
On the other hand, the learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioners.
Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that the seized articles have been recovered from motorcycles with which the petitioners have no concern, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Exclusive Special Excise Court No. 1st, Bhojpur at Ara in connection with Chandi P.S. Case No. 51 of 2026, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. as Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.33997 of 2026(2) dt.21-05-2026 well as the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors should be the family member/relative/known of the petitioner(s) who shall provide official document / personal affidavit to show his/her bona fide; (ii) the petitioner(s) shall appear on each and every date before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of their bail bond by the Trial Court itself; (iii) the petitioner(s) shall in no way try to induce or promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidences, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of the bail bonds. (Ajit Kumar, J) rishi/- U T
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.