SIDDHANT @ SIDDHARTH YADAV v. THE STATE OF BIHAR BIHAR
Judgment
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : For the Opposite Party/s : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY Mr.Anant Kumar Mishra Mr.A.G. ORAL ORDER 4 09-11-2022 The present matter has been listed under the heading “To Be Mentioned”. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. Office has reported that order dated 18.07.2022 contains some typographical error in the name of Hon’ble Judge on both the places of the said orders i.e. the name of the Hon’ble Judge has been typed/printed as HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA instead of HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY at the top and (Arun Kumar Jha, J) instead of (Alok Kumar Pandey, J) at the bottom, which appears to be a typographical error. Accordingly, in order dated 18.07.2022 name of Hon’ble Judge be read as HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY in place of HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32000 of 2022(4) dt.09-11-2022 ARUN KUMAR JHA at the top and (Alok Kumar Pandey, J) in place of (Arun Kumar Jha, J) at the bottom. In the aforesaid manner, order dated 18.07.2022 stands modified to the extent, stated above. Let this order be communicated to the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea in connection with K. Hat P.S. Case No. 470 of 2021. amitkr/- U T (Alok Kumar Pandey, J)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.