SANGITA KUMARI v. THE STATE OF BIHAR
Case at a glance
Outcome
Bail granted
resigned, this anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 ss. 120(B), 420, 467, 468, 471
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 438(2)
Key paragraphs
- Para 66. Considering the fact that petitioner has already resigned, this anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that let the above named petitioner in the event of her arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on…
Judgment
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : For the Opposite Party/s : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER Mr. Dhananjay Kumar Pandey, Advocate Mr. Ajay Mishra, A.P.P. 3 27-07-2023 Heard the parties.
#2. Petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 467, 468, 471, 420 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code.
#3. The petitioner is alleged to have obtained appointment, as Assistant Teacher, on the basis of forged and fabricated document(s).
#4. It is submitted on behalf of petitioner that petitioner was appointed, as Assistant Teacher, after investigation of all her educational certificates by the concerned department, but later on, same have been declared as forged and fabricated without proper verification or giving any notice to the petitioner. Moreover, petitioner has already resigned from the service on
23.10.2018 (Annexure- ‘1’ to the supplementary affidavit). Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32151 of 2023(3) dt.27-07-2023
#5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.
#6. Considering the fact that petitioner has already resigned, this anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that let the above named petitioner in the event of her arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Banka in connection with Katoriya P. S. Case No. 24 of 2023, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Navya/- U T (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: resigned, this anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Indian Penal Code, 1860 — ss. 120(B), 420, 467, 468, 471; Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — s. 438(2).
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.