✦ Patna High Court

Kumari Archana @ Rinu v. Ajit Ranjan

Miscellaneous Appeal No. 311 of 2023BIBEK CHAUDHURI, CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA

Case at a glance

Bench
BIBEK CHAUDHURI, CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA

Provisions considered

Key paragraphs

  • Para 33. Accordingly, the instant application under Order 41, Rule 19 of Code of Civil Procedure is allowed.

Judgment

Versus Ajit Ranjan Son of Ram Prasad Singh @ Kailash Singh, Resident of Village Rewasi, P.S Riga, District Sitamarhi. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : : For the Petitioner/s For the Opposite Party/s : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIBEK CHAUDHURI HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIBEK CHAUDHURI) Mr. Manoj Kumar Jha, Advocate Mr. 3 23-06-2026 This is an application for restoration of Miscellaneous Appeal No. 311 of 2023 which was dismissed for default on 7th April,

2.

The appellant has filed the instant application for restoration on 17th April, 2026, well within the statutory period of limitation.

3.

Accordingly, the instant application under Order 41, Rule 19 of Code of Civil Procedure is allowed.

4.

The Miscellaneous Appeal No. 311 of 2023 be restored to its original file. (Bibek Chaudhuri, J) (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J) Jyoti Kumari/- U

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Patna High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. Miscellaneous Appeal No. 311 of 2023). ← Search more judgments