Lucky Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
Case at a glance
Outcome
Allowed
The writ application stands allowed with liberty
Provisions considered
Key paragraphs
- Para 77. The writ application stands allowed with liberty Patna High Court CWJC No.5841 of 2016(6) dt.30-07-2025 to Respondent-State to proceed afresh in accordance with law. Gaurav Sinha/- U (Alok Kumar Sinha, J)
Judgment
Patna High Court CWJC No.5841 of 2016(6) dt.30-07-2025
The Sub - Divisional officer, Triveni Canal, Ram Nagar, P.O. and P.S. Ram Nagar, District West Cham ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 6426 of 2016 ====================================================== Subhash Kumar Son of Late Om Prakash Gupta resident of Mohalla - Ram Nagar, P.O. and P.S. Ram Nagar, District - West Champaran at Bettiah Versus ... ... Petitioner/s The State Of Bihar The Secretary, Water Resources Development Department, Patna The Executive Engineer, Triveni Canal, Ram Nagar, P.O. and P.S. Ram Nagar, District West Champaran The Sub - Divisional officer, Triveni Canal, Ram Nagar, P.O. and P.S. Ram Nagar, District West Cham ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 6488 of 2016 ====================================================== Parsuram Prasad Gupta son of Mohan Prasad Gupta, resident of Mohalla- Ram Nagar, P.O. and P.S.- Ram Nagar, District- West Champaran at Bettiah Versus ... ... Petitioner/s The State Of Bihar The Secretary, Water Resources Development Department, Patna The Executive Engineer, Triveni Canal, Ram Nagar, P.O. and P.S.- Ram Nagar, District- West Champara The Sub-Divisional Officer, Triveni Canal, Ram Nagar, P.O. and P.S.- Ram Nagar, District- West Cham
4. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 6604 of 2016 ======================================================
1.1. Sheela Devi W/o Late Bharat Prasad Gupta R/o Mohalla - Ram Nagar, P.O. and P.S. - Ram Nagar, Distt. - West Champaran at Bettiah
1.2. Subham Kumar (Minor) Son of Late Bharat Prasad Gupta, Represented through his mother namely Sheela Devi, R/o Mohalla - Ram Nagar, P.O. and P.S. - Ram Nagar, Distt. - West Champaran at Bettiah
1.3. Saloni Kumari (Minor) D/o Late Bharat Prasad Gupta, Represented through Patna High Court CWJC No.5841 of 2016(6) dt.30-07-2025 her mother namely Sheela Devi, R/o Mohalla - Ram Nagar, P.O. and P.S. - Ram Nagar, Distt. - West Champaran at Bettiah Versus ... ... Petitioner/s
4. The State Of Bihar The Secretary, Water Resources Development Department, Patna. The Executive Engineer, Triveni Canal, Ram Nagar, P.O. and P.S. Ram Nagar, District West Champaran The Sub-Divisional Officer, Triveni Canal, Ram Nagar, P.O. and P.S. Ram Nagar, District West Champa ... ... Respondent/s Mr. Shashi Shekhar Dvivedi, Sr. Advocate Mr. Ashutosh Kumar Pandey Mr. Parth Gaurav Mr.Ranjan Kumar Dubey Mr. Raj Kishore, GP-18 Mr. Shashi Shekhar Dvivedi, Sr. Advocate Mr. Ashutosh Kumar Pandey Mr. Parth Gaurav Mr.Ranjan Kumar Dubey Mr. Sitaram Yadav, GP-17 Mr. Shashi Shekhar Dvivedi, Sr. Advocate Mr. Ashutosh Kumar Pandey Mr. Parth Gaurav Mr.Ranjan Kumar Dubey Mr. Kameshwar Kumar, GP-17 ====================================================== Appearance : (In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 5841 of 2016) : For the Petitioner/s : : : : For the Respondent/s (In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 6401 of 2016) : For the Petitioner/s : : : For the Respondent/s : (In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 6422 of 2016) : For the Petitioner/s : : : : For the Respondent/s (In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 6426 of 2016) : For the Petitioner/s : : : For the Respondent/s : (In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 6488 of 2016) : For the Petitioner/s : : : : : (In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 6604 of 2016) : For the Petitioner/s : : : : Mr. Shashi Shekhar Dvivedi, Sr. Advocate Mr. Ashutosh Kumar Pandey Mr. Parth Gaurav Mr.Ranjan Kumar Dubey Mr.K.P. Yadav, GP-11 Mr.Santosh Chandra Bhaskar, AC to GP-11 Mr. Shashi Shekhar Dvivedi, Sr. Advocate Mr. Ashutosh Kumar Pandey Mr. Parth Gaurav Mr.Ranjan Kumar Dubey Mr. Raj Kishore, GP-18 Mr. Shashi Shekhar Dvivedi, Sr. Advocate Mr. Ashutosh Kumar Pandey Mr. Parth Gaurav Mr.Ranjan Kumar Dubey Mr.Gp20- Nadeem Seraj For the Respondent/s ====================================================== For the Respondent/s Patna High Court CWJC No.5841 of 2016(6) dt.30-07-2025 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 6 30-07-2025 Heard learned Senior counsel for the petitioners and learned counsels for the Respondent-State.
The petitioners have challenged the notice dated
15.02.2016 (Annexure-1) issued by the respondent no. 4, namely, the Sub-Divisional Officer, Triveni Canal, Ram Nagar, directing the petitioners to remove their alleged encroachment and their pucca house from the disputed land, failing which the petitioners have been warned that the same would be vacated forcibly.
Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners submits that the notice under challenge in this writ application is cryptic and vague to the extent that it does not even disclose as to under which law this notice has been issued to the petitioners. The source of the power for issuance of this kind of vague and cryptic notice has not been disclosed in the notice. The petitioners have challenged this action on other grounds as well.
4. Learned counsel appearing for the State is unable to show the source of the power under which the impugned notice has been issued. He contends that may be this notice Patna High Court CWJC No.5841 of 2016(6) dt.30-07-2025 has been issued under Bihar Public Land Encroachment Act. Clearly, the counsel appearing for respondent-State is unable to defend the impugned notice.
From a bare perusal of the notice dated
15.02.2016 (Annexure-1) which is under challenge in this writ application, it is apparent that there is no reference to any Section or Act in the notice nor any Encroachment Case Number has been mentioned. It is a completely vague and a cryptic notice which does not even disclose the source of the power based on which such a notice has been issued. Even if it is presumed to be a notice under Section 3 of the Bihar Public Land Encroachment Act, the same should have been followed by a Land Encroachment Case/Proceeding in which the petitioners should have been granted full opportunity of participation and thereafter an order ought to have been passed under Section 6(1) of the said Act leading to issuance of notice under Section 6(2) but none of that has been done in the present case.
For the reasons as stated above, the impugned notice dated 15.02.2016 (Annexure-1) is hereby quashed and set aside.
Operative part
The writ application stands allowed with liberty Patna High Court CWJC No.5841 of 2016(6) dt.30-07-2025 to Respondent-State to proceed afresh in accordance with law. Gaurav Sinha/- U (Alok Kumar Sinha, J)
Questions this judgment answers
What did the Court decide in this case?
The Court recorded the following disposition: The writ application stands allowed with liberty
Which statutory provisions did this judgment involve?
Bihar Public Land Encroachment Act — s. 3.
Which court decided this case, and when?
Patna High Court, on 30 Jul 2025. The bench was ALOK KUMAR SINHA.
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.