KARAN HARIJAN @ KARN MEHTAR @ KARAN KUMAR @ KARAN v. The State of Bihar
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Bihar Excise Act ss. 45, 75
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 438(2)
Judgment
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : For the Opposite Party/s : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA Mr. Manoj Kumar Jha, Advocate Mr. Sanjay Kumar Sharma, A.P.P. ORAL ORDER 2 18-05-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 45 and 75 of the Bihar Excise Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent. The informant alleges that on receiving information that a person in drunken condition is creating ruckus, the police reached the place of occurrence and arrested the person and while the police along with the apprehended accused were coming to the police station, it is alleged that a mob of 50-60 persons including the petitioner surrounded the police and Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30055 of 2023(2) dt.18-05-2023 forcefully got the apprehended accused flee from the custody of the police. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case, it is next submitted that allegations are not specific and petitioner is a person with clean antecedent. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Naugachia P.S. Case No. 329 of 2022 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. GauravSinha/- U T (Satyavrat Verma, J)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.