RATAN KUMAR v. The State of Bihar
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
Judgment
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : For the Opposite Party/s : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER Mr.Prakash Chandra Jha, Advocate Mr.Ram Naresh Ray, APP 3 24-07-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since
21.11.2022 in connection with Sarai P.S. Case No. 370 of 2022, F.I.R. dated 20.11.2022 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 25(1-b)A,26,35 of the Arms Act.
The case relates to recovery of one loaded country made pistol from possession of the petitioner.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has clean antecedent. He has falsely been implicated in the present case. He further submits that from bare perusal of the FIR as well as the seizure list that one loaded country made pistol was recovered from possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29193 of 2023(3) dt.24-07-2023 there is non-compliance of Section 100 of the Cr.P.C. and the police, after investigation, submitted chargesheet against the petitioner and the petitioner is in custody since 21.11.2022.
Learned A.P.P. for the State, on the other hand, has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.-16, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Sarai P.S. Case No. 370 of 2022,with the following conditions:- (I) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his/her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his/her bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below. (II) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (III) And, further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29193 of 2023(3) dt.24-07-2023 criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification. Nitesh/- U T (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.