Amit Sagar v. The State of Bihar
Case at a glance
- Bench
- SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 s. 302
- Arms Act, 1959 s. 27
Judgment
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-442 Year-2023 Thana- KADAMKUAN District- Patna ====================================================== Md. Amir Ali Son Of Md. Ikram Resident Of Bari Masjid, P.S. - Alamganj, District - Patna The State Of Bihar Versus ... ... Petitioner/S ====================================================== CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 30705 of 2024 ... ... Opposite Party/s Arising Out of PS. Case No.-442 Year-2023 Thana- KADAMKUAN District- Patna ====================================================== Md.Shahzadhussain @ Md .shahzad Hussain @ Natu Son Of Md. Jawedhussain @md. Jawed Hussain Resident Of Village- Lodi Katra, Patna City, P.S.- Khajekalan, District- Patna The State Of Bihar Versus ... ... Petitioner/S ====================================================== Appearance : (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 23427 of 2024) ... ... Opposite Party/s Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 23427 of 2024(3) dt.26-04-2024 Mr.Rakesh Dubey Mr.Pawan Kumar Chaurasia : For the Petitioner/s For the Opposite Party/s : (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.
23878 of 2024) Mr.Shakil Ahmad Khan For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Raj Kishor Singh For the Opposite Party/s : (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 30705 of 2024) For the Petitioner/s : For the Opposite Party/s : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR Mr.Pramod Kumar Mr.Shailendra Kumar 3 26-04-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, ORAL ORDER learned counsel for the informant and learned APP for the State. The petitioners have filed the instant application for grant of regular bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of Arms Act. It is a case of commission of murder of nephew by opening fire by unknown persons due to which he succumbed to injuries during the course of treatment. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners are innocent and they have committed no offence.
They have falsely been implicated in the present case. Neither the petitioners are named in F.I.R. nor anything incriminating has been Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 23427 of 2024(3) dt.26-04-2024 recovered from their conscious possession. There is no eye witness of the alleged offence. The name of Amit Sagar (petitioner in Cr. Misc. No. 23427 of 2024) sprang up in this case on the basis of confessional statement of Md. Belal. Moreover, the petitioners are languishing in judicial custody for more than six months. Similarly situated co-accused Sintu Kumar has already been granted bail vide order dated 01.02.2024, passed in Cr. Misc. No. 84190 of 2023 by this Court. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for Bail. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case as well as period of custody, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail.
The above named petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with Kadamkuan P.S. Case No. 442 of 2023 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 23427 of 2024(3) dt.26-04-2024 each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional District & Sessions Judge XIII, Patna/concerned court. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Nirajkrs/- U T
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.