TINKAL @ RAHUL MISHRA v. THE STATE OF BIHAR ………. Opp.Party

and learned counsel for the State. Case is under section 25(1-B)A/26 of the Arms Act. It is said that one country made pistol was recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that one more case is against petitioner. However, by producing final report, submits completion investigation in the said case, final report has been submitted and petitioner has not been sent up for trial. It is said that petitioner is in custody since 12.6.2009. Considering circumstances, this application is allowed. Let petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Bikramganj, Rohtas in Bikramganj P.S.Case No.96 of 2009 with conditions as laid - 2 - down in Sub-Section (3) of Section 437 of the Code of Criminal Procedure as may be applicable and also that one of the bailors shall be a close relation of the petitioner. In case of breach of any of the conditions at any stage to the satisfaction of the concerned court below, it shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioner and take steps for his arrest. Pradeep/ (J. N. Singh, J.)