✦ Patna High Court

MAIMUM KHATOON v. THE STATE OF BIHAR

JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR.MISC No. 36093 of 2009SHEEMA ALI KHAN

Case at a glance

Provisions considered

Judgment

appearing on behalf of the State. Petitioner is apprehending her arrest in a case under Sections 363, 365, 366, 367 and 380/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The allegation against the petitioner is that the she along with her husband kidnapped the informant’s/complainant’s wife. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that three days prior to the complaint, this petitioner had filed an application before the Sub-divisional Officer, Siwan that it appears that her husband and she would be made accused in a case filed by Kallu Mian on the ground that her husband had married a lady by the name of Sanjida Khatoon. This Sanjida Khatoon was earlier married to Kallu Mian as a result of which Kallu Mian was implicating this petitioner and her husband in a false case. Be that as it may, considering that petitioner is herself is a victim of the circumstances, I direct that she be released on anticipatory bail in the event of her arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks in Bhagwan Bazar P.S. Case No. 196 of 2009 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mokama, Saran subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. Sanjay (Sheema Ali Khan, J.)

Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case

No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.

This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.

Why is this linked?

This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record. Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on Patna High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. JUDICATURE AT PATNA CR.MISC No. 36093 of 2009). ← Search more judgments