Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. v. The State of Bihar, reported
Case at a glance
- Bench
- SUDHIR SINGH
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 s. 498A
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 438(2)
Judgment
The State Of Bihar Priti Father's Name Or Husband Name Not Given Resident Of-Subhash Nagar, Mohalla Pokhara, P.S.-Hajipur Town, District-Vaishali ... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : For the Opposite Party/s : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH Mr.Sunil Kumar Singh, Advocate Mr.Shyam Bihari Singh, APP ORAL ORDER 2 24-06-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. The case is triable by Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25774 of 2023(2) dt.24-06-2023 the Magistrate.
The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182. On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the Complaint Case/F.I.R. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Complaint Case No. 1058/2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The petitioner is directed to co-operate during the trial. If the petitioner does not co-operate during the trial, the Court below will be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.
If so advised, either of the parties will be at liberty to make an application before the Court below for referring the matter to the District Mediation Centre for the purpose of Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25774 of 2023(2) dt.24-06-2023 reconciliation or one time settlement. In case, any such application is made by either of the parties, the Court below shall refer the matter to the District Mediation Centre. Pankaj/Nitin U T (Sudhir Singh, J)
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.