CHAMELI DEVI & Ors. v. RAM PYARI DEVI & Ors.
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 O. 6 r. 17
Judgment
5500/-. Thereafter when the defendants had filed a written statement, they had specifically questioned the valuation of the suit and at that point also the plaintiffs petitioners did not wake up, rather after five years of filing of the suit also when the issues were being framed the plaintiffs petitioners took a clear and categorical stand that the suit was properly valued and accordingly, one of the issues framed by the court below was as with regard to valuation of the suit. After all this, the plaintiffs petitioners came out with an application on
5.10.2005 seeking revision of valuation of the suit from Rs. 5500/- to Rs. 3,11,750/-. 2 This was definitely a calculated end to get away from the court in seisin of the suit which had in fact by the same impugned order also fixed the case for hearing on a preliminary issue raised by the defendants no. 1 3 regard maintainability of the suit on the ground of resjudicata. Such practice of the plaintiffs of valuing a suit to be Rs.5500/- continuing with the proceedings for next 5-6 years and thereafter getting it enhance cannot be permitted in view of the provisions of Order 6 Rule 17 C.P.C. which has a very sanguine purpose and should not be allowed to be abused in the manner chosen to be done so by the plaintiffs petitioners. That being so, this Court would not find any reason to interfere with the impugned order. This revision application is, accordingly, dismissed. (Mihir Kumar Jha,J.) Surendra/
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.