AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 24578 of 2022 · Patna High Court
Case at a glance
Provisions considered
- Indian Penal Code, 1860 s. 414
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 s. 438(2)
Judgment
Mohan Yadav @ Manmohan Yadav Son of Andho Yadav Resident of village - Chowkchama, P.S.- Amdabad, District - Katihar.
Pankaj Bhagat @ Pankaj Kumar Bhagat Son of Sri Krishna Bhagat Resident of village - Chowkchama, P.S.- Amdabad, District - Katihar. Raju Sharma Son of Harendra Sharma Resident of village - Gheragaon, P.S.- Amdabad, District - Katihar The State of Bihar. Versus ... ... Petitioner/s ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioners For the State For the Mines Deptt. Mr. Rajendra Prasad Sah, Advocate Md. Ataur Rahman, APP Mr. Naresh Dikshit, Spl. P.P., Mines Mr. U. Anand, AC to Spl. P.P., Mines : : : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 3 13-09-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Manihari P.S. Case No.170 of 2021, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 414 of the Indian Penal Code and Bihar (Concession Bevention of Illegal Mining Transportation Storage) Rule, 2019.
Rule 56 & 39(3) as amended, 2021. The petitioners are said to have stored the stone chips for transportation illegally due to which the government sustained loss of Rs.8,61,000/-. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24578 of 2022(3) dt.13-09-2022 petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the present case. It is submitted that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent as stated in paragraph-3 of the bail application. It is further submitted that the petitioners are not named in the FIR. During investigation, nearby people disclosed that the said stone chips belongs to the petitioners and on that basis the petitioners are made accused in the present case. Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners. Considering the fact that there is no specific allegation against the petitioners, let petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/- (rupees twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Katihar in connection with Manihari P.S. Case No.170 of 2021, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) Sanjay/- U T
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.