MD. NEHAL v. The State of Bihar

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : For the Opposite Party/s : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR Mr. Ram Prawesh Kumar, Advocate Mr. Anil Kumar Singh No. 1, APP ORAL ORDER 2 10-10-2022 At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the petition of petitioner no.1. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the petition of petitioner no.1 is dismissed as withdrawn. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner nos.2 and 3 and learned APP for the State. The petitioner nos.2 and 3 are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307 and 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24486 of 2022(2) dt.10-10-2022 Allegedly, it is a case of assault upon the informant and his son, due to which they sustained injuries. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners. Petitioners have clean antecedent. Learned APP appearing for the State opposed the anticipatory bail. Considering the aforesaid submissions, let the petitioners, namely, Md. Rohit alias Rohit and Md. Salim, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of CJM, Purnea in connection with K.Hat (Sahayak) P.S. Case No. 975 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. Brajesh Kumar/- U T (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)