MANJU DEVI v. LALITA PRASAD
Case at a glance
- Bench
- MIHIR KUMAR JHA
Provisions considered
- Indian Succession Act, 1925 s. 283(1)(C)
Judgment
At this stage, Mr. Narayan, counsel for the petitioner submits that as a matter of fact the Sub. Judge has no jurisdiction to initiate a proceeding for grant of probate. However this question having not raised either before the Court below or even in this civil revision application cannot be gone into on the oral submission of the counsel for the petitioner. There being thus no merit in this application, the same is dismissed. ( Mihir Kumar Jha, J. ) Abhay Kumar
Precedent status how later indexed judgments have treated this case
No known negative treatment found in the Courts & Cases corpus.
This is a result about the indexed corpus, not a finding that the judgment remains good law. Coverage may be incomplete.
This is the original judgment text, reproduced from the public court record.
Always verify it against the official record before relying on it in a filing — check it on
Patna High Court or eCourts case status (search case no. JUDICATURE AT PATNA C.R No. 1085 of 2008).
← Search more judgments